Blogs

INDUSTRY NEWS

Pittsburgh Ordinance Bans Tests for Many Prospective and Current Employees Who Use Medical Marijuana

By Taylor Brailey and Nancy Delogu on October 3, 2024

On September 24, 2024, the Pittsburgh City Council passed a new ordinance prohibiting discrimination against an individual's status as a medical marijuana patient. Mayor Ed Gainey signed the ordinance the same day, making it effective immediately.

The new ordinance makes it an unlawful employment practice for employers with five or more employees, employment agencies, and labor organizations to require applicants who hold valid Pennsylvania medical marijuana cards to participate in a pre-employment drug test for marijuana. It also limits employers' right to require marijuana tests of employees who hold Pennsylvania medical marijuana cards during the course of employment absent suspicion of impairment.

The ordinance identifies a medical marijuana patient as "[a]n individual who has a serious medical condition, disability or handicap such that qualifies them for medical marijuana use" and is certified under Pennsylvania law to use marijuana for medical reasons. By its terms, the ordinance therefore would not protect individuals who do not participate in the Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana Program.

The new Pittsburgh ordinance is unlike statutes in other jurisdictions that provide employment protections to workers who participate in state medical marijuana programs because it targets employer-mandated drug tests rather than limits employers from taking adverse action on the basis of an individual's state-sanctioned marijuana use. In New Jersey, for example, employers are not prohibited from testing applicants or employees for marijuana (as otherwise permitted by state law) but they are limited in their ability to take adverse action against an individual who tests positive. Protections for medical marijuana users exist as a matter of Pennsylvania law, but that statute does not limit who can be tested; it only potentially limits what an employer can do when it learns of a positive marijuana test.

The Pittsburgh ordinance's focus on whether an employer can test in the first instance poses a challenge for employers that typically will not know that an individual holds a medical marijuana card unless an employee volunteers that information. The timing of such a communication will be particularly problematic for pre-hire testing, inasmuch as employers typically do not know and generally cannot ask about an individual's medical condition prior to making a conditional offer of employment.

The new law does include industry and position-specific exceptions, as well as safety-related exceptions to the otherwise blanket prohibition on marijuana testing of Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana Program participants. For example, the prohibition does not apply to any persons working in positions subject to drug testing due to regulations issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation (which would preempt state and local law in any event) or the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation; any persons working in positions that require the person to carry a firearm; or any applicants whose prospective employer is a party to a valid collective bargaining agreement that specifically addresses the pre-employment drug testing of applicants. However, the ordinance has comparatively few exceptions relative to the state Medical Marijuana Act.

Consistent with Pennsylvania's Medical Marijuana Act, employers may take action against medical marijuana patients under the influence of medical marijuana, which is considered established if a test shows more than 10 nanograms of active tetrahydrocannabinol per milliliter in their blood. State law permits an employer to prohibit workers from (a) operating or being in control of chemicals requiring permits issued by the government, or (b) operating or being in control of high-voltage electricity or public utilities. In addition, medical marijuana patients who are under the influence of medical marijuana may not (a) perform any employment duties at heights or in confined spaces, (b) perform tasks deemed by the employer to be life-threatening to the employee or to other employees of the employer, or (c) perform any duty that could result in a public health or safety risk while under the influence of medical marijuana.

Since this section of the ordinance refers to state law, it is likely that these exceptions will be interpreted consistent with the state provisions. That said, although a few Pennsylvania courts have issued decisions applying the Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana Act's provisions, the scope of the state's exemptions are in many ways still open to interpretation. For example, state courts that have reviewed the issue have concluded that the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act does not require employers to accommodate a disabled employee's medical marijuana use.

Pittsburgh's new ordinance does specifically allow employers to continue to do the following:

  • take disciplinary action against medical marijuana patients if an employee is under the influence of medical marijuana in the workplace or is working while under the influence of medical marijuana, where the employee's conduct falls below the standard of care normally accepted for their position;
  • prohibit the use of medical marijuana on its property or in the workplace;
  • test medical marijuana patients for illegal use of controlled substances;
  • conduct for-cause drug testing if there is reasonable cause to suspect an employee is under the influence of a drug at work; and
  • perform drug tests after a workplace accident.

In light of this new ordinance, employers that hire or employ workers in Pittsburgh may want to evaluate their pre-hire drug testing program and ensure: (1) they have a process for identifying workers who participate in the Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana program after conditional offers of employment are made; and (2) identify which positions, if any, they believe would be excepted from the pre-hire testing ban, either for safety reasons or because of an existing collective bargaining agreement. Employers may also wish to adopt a process that requires employees who would typically be subject to more expansive testing to notify those employees so the employer can take steps to determine which testing is appropriate. Once hired, all workers can be subject to for-cause marijuana testing, but suspicionless tests should be limited for those individuals who participate in the Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana Program unless they are assigned work that falls into one of the ordinance's exceptions.

This article was originally published on Littler Mendelson's website. Click here to read the original article.

© 2024 Littler Mendelson. All Rights Reserved. LITTLER MENDELSON®, ASAP®, INSIGHT® and LITTLER REPORT® are registered trademarks of Littler Mendelson, P.C.

Posted: October 8, 2024


All Rights Reserved © 2024 Business Information Group, Inc.
This document and/or presentation is provided as a service to our customers. Its contents are designed solely for informational purposes, and should not be inferred or understood as legal advice or binding case law, nor shared with any third parties. Persons in need of legal assistance should seek the advice of competent legal counsel. Although care has been taken in preparation of these materials, we cannot guarantee the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information contained within it. Anyone using this information does so at his or her own risk.

Sending...
Thank you for your interest in Business Information Group. We have received your message and will contact you in one business day or less.
You have exceeded the number of attempts to submit this form. As a result, your IP address has been temporarily blocked.

Get In Touch

Send a Message *fields required

What are your Interests?optional

Contact Information

Even our RFP PROCESS is state-of-the-art.

Take a look
RFP Kit

What our clients are saying

We cannot express enough how much we have enjoyed working with BIG! It has really benefitted our processing and ease of doing business!

Licensing and Registration Manager
Investment and Insurance Company

I enjoy collaborating with BIG, and know that if I have to reach out with a question/concern, a positive attitude with a willingness to find resolve is on the other side of an email or a phone call.

Human Resources Administrator
Global Financial Services Firm

You have been the most professional and most helpful business partner that I have ever been associated with — always there to assist us and with rapid turnaround times.

Principal Consultant
Major Professional Services Network

I am confident whenever we add a product with your company that I will have a good experience.

Division Manager
Insurance and Financial Services Agency

We have received superior service and we know this is what you and your team strive for. We are grateful for the dedication, level of professionalism and effort shown.

Agent
Large Insurance Agency

You are leaving BIGReport.com

Ok, Continue Cancel

×
×