Blogs

INDUSTRY NEWS

Lessons from Recent IER Settlements

By Bruce Buchanan on September 27, 2024

Over the past few months, the Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER) of the Department of Justice has entered into several settlements from which employers can learn some valuable lessons so that these discriminatory practices are not followed.

In a recent settlement, a transportation and parking management company agreed to settle an IER charge to resolve IER's determination that the company discriminated against the Charging Party when it refused to honor the employee's valid Employment Authorization Document (EAD).

Here, an employee presented an EAD to the employer which appeared to have expired. The employee was a beneficiary of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) based upon her status as a national of Haiti. To qualify for TPS, an individual must be a national of the foreign country with a TPS designation; be continuously physically present in the United States since the effective date of designation; have continuously resided in the United States since a date specified by the Secretary of Homeland Security; and not be inadmissible to the United States.

The employee's EAD had been automatically extended by the federal government due to ongoing litigation on whether to terminate TPS for Haiti. Thus, the EAD, even with an expired date, showed the employee was authorized to work in the United States. IER determined that the employer did not believe the employee had TPS from Haiti because the EAD listed the country of birth as Bahamas. However, as noted above, the test is not citizenship of a country, rather it is whether you are a foreign national of a designated TPS country. Thus, the employer should have the reviewed the category code on the EAD and its expiration date and then checked the USCIS website, where it shows country's automatic extension date.

In the settlement, the employer agreed to reinstate the employee, pay her $3,668 in backpay, pay $2,000 in civil penalties, and other standard remedies - view an IER webinar, and revise any problematic policies.

In another settlement, the IER determined that a transportation management company discriminated against an employee because he was not a U.S. citizen. The employer, which used a third-party staffing agency to fill its positions on the project, asked the agency to withdraw a job offer to a worker when the company learned he was not a U.S. citizen.

In order to require U.S. citizenship for a position, there must be a requirement under federal, state, or local laws or federal contracts that specific positions to be filled only by U.S. citizens. In this situation, the company did not have any legal justification for withdrawing the offer.

In the settlement, the employer agreed to pay the employee backpay, pay $4,610 in civil penalties, and the other aforementioned standard remedies.

The third settlement involved a successor in interest to a staffing company, which was found liable for the predecessor's actions. In this case, the IER concluded the predecessor employer required that non-U.S. citizens present specific types of documentation reflecting their immigration status to prove their permission to work. However, U.S. citizens could present any acceptable document of their choosing.

U.S. citizens, U.S. nationals, lawful permanent residents, asylees, refugees and other non-U.S. citizens with permission to work may legally work in the United States if they can prove their identity and permission to work. Federal law prohibits employers from asking for specific or unnecessary documents because of a worker's citizenship, immigration status or national origin. Employers must allow workers to present whatever acceptable documentation the workers choose and cannot reject valid documentation that reasonably appears to be genuine and relates to the worker.

In the settlement, the employer agreed to pay $46,050 in civil penalties plus implement the other standard remedies.

In the past 5-10 years, the IER has become much more aggressive in its investigations and settlements. Often, the legal fees can be between $25,000 and $50,000 even if the employer settles the charge. Thus, employers would be wise to learn from the above errors.

This article was originally published on Littler Mendelson's website. Click here to read the original article.

© 2024 Littler Mendelson. All Rights Reserved. LITTLER MENDELSON®, ASAP®, INSIGHT® and LITTLER REPORT® are registered trademarks of Littler Mendelson, P.C.

Posted: September 30, 2024


All Rights Reserved © 2024 Business Information Group, Inc.
This document and/or presentation is provided as a service to our customers. Its contents are designed solely for informational purposes, and should not be inferred or understood as legal advice or binding case law, nor shared with any third parties. Persons in need of legal assistance should seek the advice of competent legal counsel. Although care has been taken in preparation of these materials, we cannot guarantee the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information contained within it. Anyone using this information does so at his or her own risk.

Sending...
Thank you for your interest in Business Information Group. We have received your message and will contact you in one business day or less.
You have exceeded the number of attempts to submit this form. As a result, your IP address has been temporarily blocked.

Get In Touch

Send a Message *fields required

What are your Interests?optional

Contact Information

Even our RFP PROCESS is state-of-the-art.

Take a look
RFP Kit

What our clients are saying

We cannot express enough how much we have enjoyed working with BIG! It has really benefitted our processing and ease of doing business!

Licensing and Registration Manager
Investment and Insurance Company

I enjoy collaborating with BIG, and know that if I have to reach out with a question/concern, a positive attitude with a willingness to find resolve is on the other side of an email or a phone call.

Human Resources Administrator
Global Financial Services Firm

You have been the most professional and most helpful business partner that I have ever been associated with — always there to assist us and with rapid turnaround times.

Principal Consultant
Major Professional Services Network

I am confident whenever we add a product with your company that I will have a good experience.

Division Manager
Insurance and Financial Services Agency

We have received superior service and we know this is what you and your team strive for. We are grateful for the dedication, level of professionalism and effort shown.

Agent
Large Insurance Agency

You are leaving BIGReport.com

Ok, Continue Cancel

×
×